Delta Air Lines is suspending service to several stations, citing health concerns as the primary reason. How convenient that all of the airports happen to be in metropolitan airports not too far from larger Delta stations…
While Delta concedes “customer volume is significantly reduced” at these stations, it frames the changes in terms of protecting employee health:
“These changes will allow more of our frontline employees to minimize their COVID-19 exposure risk while ensuring convenient access to Delta’s network for those who must travel. Delta will continue providing essential service to impacted communities via neighboring airports.”
The temporary shutdowns will begin on May 13, 2020 and last through at least September 2020. The left column below indicates airports that will lose service while the right column indicates the closest alternate Delta station. In most cases, the airports are less than an hour apart.
Temporarily Suspended Airport |
Nearest Delta-Served Airport |
Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW) |
Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) |
Oakland International Airport (OAK) |
San Francisco International Airport (SFO) |
Hollywood Burbank Airport (BUR) |
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) |
Long Beach Airport (LGB) |
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) |
T. F. Green International Airport (PVD) |
Logan International Airport (BOS) |
Westchester County Airport (HPN) |
LaGuardia Airport (LGA) |
Stewart International Airport (SWF) |
John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) |
Akron-Canton Airport (CAK) |
Cleveland Hopkins International Airport (CLE) |
Manchester-Boston Regional Airport (MHT) |
Logan International Airport (BOS) |
Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport (PHF) |
Norfolk International Airport (ORF) |
Delta will also suspend service to Saskatoon International Airport (YXE), which has no nearby alternatives.
Sandy Gordon, Delta’s Senior Vice President – Domestic Airport Operations, added:
“The safety of our employees and customers remains our primary focus as we navigate these challenges together. By consolidating operations while customer traffic is low, we can allow more of our people to stay home in accordance with local health guidelines.”
That’s very kind of Delta, but smaller stations with fewer people pose a smaller health risk than consolidating passengers into one airport, making airport lobbies, security checkpoints, and airplanes more crowded.
Is This Even Legal?
Some of you may be asking if this is even legal. Didn’t Delta except CARES Act funding, which stipulated that all stations had to remain open in exchange for the government handout?
Yes, that was my reading too. But the DOT has allowed airlines to consolidate operations in multi-airport regions, with a fairly generous allowance. Hawaiian and JetBlue have also consolidated flights.
Delta warns more consolidation is ahead:
“Delta is looking at other opportunities to take similar measures in additional markets. Late last month, Delta filed a request with the U.S. Department of Transportation to consolidate operations in another nine cities served by multiple airports. That request is still under review.”
CONCLUSION
Like Chris form Rene’s Points, Burbank is also the airport closest to me and I hate to see it lose another carrier. On the one hand, with loads so low, the service simply seems unnecessary at this point with Los Angeles International so close. But this idea that airlines can suspend service to many smaller airports and corral them all into larger airports nearby does run contrary to the spirit of the CARES Act, as it was sold to the public, and arguably puts more people at risk of COVID-19 than less.
This is all about trying to save a few bucks. I just wish Delta had admitted it instead of hiding behind safety.
image: Delta
It’s clearly a move to consolidate operations in certain markets. And they are trying to circumvent the CARES act by citing, “health reasons.” I mean, in places like the Hampton Roads area it’s not a huge deal as ORF is still a small airport and perfectly easy for those in Newport News to get to. But why? That area of Virginia has not been anywhere near a hotspot or ever having overwhelming Covid issues. There is no health benefit in consolidating at ORF.
If “health” was truly a factor in these decisions they would consolidate flights to DCA and drop IAD and BWI. Especially given we are still an area with rising cases and a high number of per capita infections. But they don’t. Why? Because the DC market is still getting a decent amount of passengers at all three given essential Govt. workers. Oh, and the people behind the CARES might notice it more if DC is consolidated.
You called this right, Matthew. And if they get away with it I would imagine AA and DL to follow suit.
In its press releases Delta says its doing everything it can to create a “healthy flying experience” and to ensure “customers can fly with confidence.”
Yet, in its recent filing with the DoT to suspend minimum service required by the CARES Act to airports like Kalamazoo, Flint, and Lansing, Delta specifically said it was requesting to discontinue those flights for health and safety reasons. “…Delta seeks an exemption to protect the health and safety of airport staff by reducing their exposure to the health risks associated with COVID-19.” https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=DOT-OST-2020-0037-0102
As reported in this article, Delta is suspending service to ten ‘co-terminal’ destinations in order “…to minimize their (employees’) COVID-19 exposure risk…” https://news.delta.com/delta-temporarily-consolidate-flying-select-us-metros
Ironically, in both cases, many of the ’employees’ Delta say it wants to protect are employees of contracted ground handlers and thus aren’t even Delta employees. Will those ’employees’ receive pay protection, or just be laid-off?
So, the question must be asked of Delta, is it safe to fly or not? Delta cannot have it both ways.
Indeed, this is a key point that I already discussed last week:
https://liveandletsfly.com/delta-safety-contradiction/
Wouldn’t the closest DL station to SWF be LGA and not JFK?
“Didn’t Delta except CARES Act funding”
Once again I’d suggest better proofreading because the operative word here significantly changes the point you’re trying to make.
It was just last July of 2019 when DL started flying the BUR-ATL route nonstop. I can understand why the BUR-ATL route would be pulled, but to pull SLC when that is a great connection point to many of DL’s domestic cities beyond SLC makes no sense – and I hope the D.O.T. denies their request.
If you live in the SFV, Conjeo/Simi and/or Santa Clarita Valleys – this just requires extra time to travel down to LAX and have to deal with the “slim” pickings of flight options out of LAX…no good!
FYI- If you’re registered to vote in CA-25, don’t forget to vote and return your mail-in ballot for the special election being held Tuesday, May 12, 2020!
SO_CAL_RETAIL_SLUT