• Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Live and Let's Fly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Home » full body scanners » EU Bans Full Body Scanners While USA Embraces Them
full body scannersTSA

EU Bans Full Body Scanners While USA Embraces Them

Matthew Klint Posted onNovember 18, 2011 3 Comments

The European Union banned a variant of full body scanners (used extensively in the U.S. by the Transportation Security Administration) this week at the airports of all 27 member states,  “[I]n order not to risk jeopardizing citizens’ health and safety.”

The TSA responded to the news with a non-sequitur:

Since January 2010, advanced imaging technology has detected more than 300 dangerous or illegal items on passengers in U.S. airports nationwide.

Of course the TSA failed to mention that most of those 300 “dangerous or illegal items” were drugs like marijuana, not any credible threats to aviation security and that when it comes down to it, busting people for drugs is well beyond their job descrption.

In justifying their decision to ban X-ray type full body scanners, the EU simply pointed out the unnecessary risk walking through scanners entail:

While the level of radiation is extremely low, some studies have found that over time a small number of cancer cases could result from scanning millions of people a year.

Yes, I will be the first to say you receive more radiation during an airline flight than when walking through a full body scanner, but that does not mean we should expose people unnecessarily to any more radiation.

Oddly, there has been a carve out in the ruling for Manchester, England:

Manchester airport, which has 16 of the £80,000 machines and bars anyone refusing a scan from boarding a flight, has been told it can continue using them for another year.

If they are unsafe and ineffective, why continue to allow them in Manchester? I suspect the huge price tag of the machines had something to do it with, but certainly a human life is worth more than £80,000.

As troubling as that exception is, at least the EU is moving the right direction on this issue. Now if only the TSA could be so rational…

Get Daily Updates

Join our mailing list for a daily summary of posts! We never sell your info.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Previous Article Dilemma Solved: How I Burned 330K British Airways Miles in Two Hours
Next Article Weekend in Cyprus and Lebanon

About Author

Matthew Klint

Matthew is an avid traveler who calls Los Angeles home. Each year he travels more than 200,000 miles by air and has visited more than 135 countries. Working both in the aviation industry and as a travel consultant, Matthew has been featured in major media outlets around the world and uses his Live and Let's Fly blog to share the latest news in the airline industry, commentary on frequent flyer programs, and detailed reports of his worldwide travel.

Related Posts

  • Trump TSA funding national emergency

    Trump Declares Airport Chaos A National Emergency, Moves To Pay TSA Workers Without Congress

    March 28, 2026
  • United TSA elite Houston

    United Airlines Is Right To Escort Elites Through TSA Lines In Houston

    March 27, 2026
  • Trump TSA funding

    Trump Moves To Pay TSA Workers After Weeks Of Chaos, Using Funds That Were Always There

    March 27, 2026

3 Comments

  1. Damian Reply
    November 19, 2011 at 7:36 am

    Matthew, I just got my balls zapped in Manchester by one of these things. They have a mostly automated system here, were you go in to a standard metal detector, after you walk up to 2 glass sliding doors.. If you set off the metal detector you are sent into the Full Body Scanner, if you did not set of the metal detector door number 2 opens leading right to the bag pick up. There is no human there to even opt out if you wanted.. you are stuck in a glass box. This was in Term 2.. also had this in Term 3 at MAN..

  2. Marcus Reply
    November 20, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    Any theories on the divergent approaches here? Why does the USA keep them but the EU gets rid of them?

  3. jonny Reply
    November 27, 2011 at 12:43 am

    The eu tends to listen to people better than the us government does. I am glad the eu has said no. More countries need to tell the us to back off

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Search

Hot Deals

Note: Please see my Advertiser Disclosure

Capital One Venture X Business Card
Earn 150,000 Miles Sign Up Bonus
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card
Earn 100,000 Points
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles!
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles
Chase Ink Business Unlimited® Credit Card
Earn $750 Cash Back
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
Earn 120,000 Membership Reward® Points

Recent Posts

  • United Airlines Pan Am network comparison
    United Airlines’ Global Network Is Now Four Times Larger Than Pan Am At Its Peak March 28, 2026
  • American Airlines seatback TVs narrowbody
    American Airlines Weighs Bringing Back Seatback TVs After Betting Against Them March 28, 2026
  • Trump TSA funding national emergency
    Trump Declares Airport Chaos A National Emergency, Moves To Pay TSA Workers Without Congress March 28, 2026
  • American Airlines Short Ribs Twice Baked Potato
    Scrumptious: Short Rib With Steakhouse Sauce And Twice Baked Potato In American Airlines First Class March 27, 2026

Categories

Popular Posts

  • JetBlue Mini Mint
    JetBlue “Mini Mint” Is Getting Bigger: New Details Reveal Larger First Class Cabins March 18, 2026
  • United Polaris Studio
    Pricing Revealed: New United “Polaris Studio” Will Offer Champagne, Caviar, More Space March 20, 2026
  • a couch and table in a room
    Review: Singapore Airlines The Private Room (SIN) March 12, 2026
  • a large airplane parked in front of a building
    Etihad, Emirates Restart Flights As Qatar Airways Remains Suspended March 2, 2026

Archives

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

As seen on:

facebook twitter instagram rss
Privacy Policy © Live and Let's Fly All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Live and Let's Fly with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.