• Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Live and Let's Fly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Home » Law In Travel » Italian Law Allows For Clever Airline Ticket Manipulation
Law In Travel

Italian Law Allows For Clever Airline Ticket Manipulation

Matthew Klint Posted onJune 10, 2019November 14, 2023 15 Comments

a white airplane on a runway

What if you could take advantage of Italian law to beat airlines at their own game? The possibilities are fascinating.

In theory, you can book a multi-city airline ticket “in” Italy on any airline, then skip whatever segments you want without ramifications. Practically, you can do this for a number of airlines including Alitalia, Emirates, Lufthansa, and Qatar Airways.

For simplicity, let’s focus on Lufthansa here. As noted by God Save the Points, in 2017 the Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) held that customers were not properly informed of the penalties for missing a flight segment. While legacy carriers will cancel the remainder of your flight segments after missing one, budget carriers like Ryanair allow you to skip a segment and fly the remainder of the itinerary.

This created consumer confusion and Italian authorities determined that airlines like Lufthansa did not clearly reveal to customers the penalties for missing a flight. Rather than just simply require clearer disclosure, the AGCM mandated that airlines allow passengers to skip segments at no cost, as long as they notify the airline in a timely manner.

Thus, Lufthansa now explicitly offers this possibility:

Passengers holding a Lufthansa ticket issued in Italy (via LH.com/IT, LH ticket counter, LH call center or at a travel agency) may use the original booked return flight, out of sequence without recalculation and extra payment, even if the outbound section has not been used. In this case, please call the Lufthansa Customer Relations team latest 24 hours after the planned first ticketed flight segment.

Although Lufthansa tries to couch its policy in “outbound” and “return” language, the Italian regulation actually prescribes that if you skip one segment, further segments cannot be cancelled. That opens up some interesting possibilities.

How This Works In Practice

Airline pricing is rarely correlated to distance flown. A Lufthansa flight from Milan to Frankfurt to New York is often cheaper than a ticket from Frankfurt to New York alone. In some cases, a round-trip ticket from Europe to the United States is cheaper than a one-way ticket from U.S. to Europe.

So think of the possibilities. Say you’re in Frankfurt and want to travel to New York nonstop. Tickets can be pricey during the summer months:

a screenshot of a screen

But when you start in Milan, where Lufthansa will offer a far lower price if you are willing to connect in Frankfurt:

a screenshot of a white and black screen

Note the flights between Frankfurt and New York above are the same flights and on the same dates in both itineraries. Under Italian law, you can book the second ticket on Lufthansa’s Italian website, skip the Milan to Frankfurt segment, call Lufthansa to let them know, and fly from Frankfurt to New York at a fraction of the cost.

In theory. I just have to add that warning. So often, we see rules and regulations on the book only to see them ignored or openly flouted. Although the AGCM has determined that airlines operating in Europe must abide by these rules, if Lufthansa decides not to abide by them it will be up to consumers to fight back. Most may not consider it worth the effort. I have not tried this “loophole” personally.

I focus on Lufthansa because the German airline made a fool of itself (in my assessment) by suing a passenger in Berlin for essentially do the same thing. Lufthansa lost on procedural grounds, but the idea that airlines can punish consumers for taking advantage of pricing loopholes is a waning legal theory.

> Read More: My Prediction: Lufthansa Hidden City Lawsuit Will Backfire

My example above is draconian, but there are even more draconian examples available. Technically, the ticket does not even have to touch Italy for these rules to apply. Instead, it must simply be booked through an Italian booking channel. Thus, my example above could have been London to Frankfurt to New York or Oslo to Frankfurt to New York.

I strongly doubt this is what the Italian authorities were intending to protect. The AGCM probably thought it was just protecting passengers who only wanted to use the return portion of their one-way ticket. But for better or for worse (and I say better, since only airlines get away with charging more for A than A + B), there are all sorts of arbitrage opportunities with this Italian rule.

Which Airlines Abide By AGCM Ruling

While theoretically this applies to all airlines operating within Italy, American Airlines and British Airways have chosen not to respect the authority’s decree. These carriers risk fine for their actions, but have taken the position that the risk of fine is a better alternative than rolling over to passenger manipulation.

But the following carriers have explicitly said you can skip a segment and call to protect the remainder of the itinerary:

  • Alitalia
  • Austrian
  • Emirates
  • Eurowings
  • Lufthansa
  • Qatar
  • SWISS

CONCLUSION

I am not necessarily encouraging you to take advantage of this Italian regulation in such an egregious way as my example above. You must consider the risks of doing so. But I do like pointing out these opportunities since airlines, generally speaking, use every trick in the book to punish passengers with strict rules and harsh fees. This just evens the playing field a little bit.

image: Lufthansa

Get Daily Updates

Join our mailing list for a daily summary of posts! We never sell your info.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Previous Article Dubai Is Manipulating Weather To Create More Rain
Next Article Hilton CEO Demonstrates Dilemma Of Tipping Housekeeping

About Author

Matthew Klint

Matthew is an avid traveler who calls Los Angeles home. Each year he travels more than 200,000 miles by air and has visited more than 135 countries. Working both in the aviation industry and as a travel consultant, Matthew has been featured in major media outlets around the world and uses his Live and Let's Fly blog to share the latest news in the airline industry, commentary on frequent flyer programs, and detailed reports of his worldwide travel.

Related Posts

  • Alitalia aircraft ITA Airbus A330

    What’s Going On With Alitalia Aircraft?

    November 17, 2024
  • Veroli italy

    The Restorative Value Of Travel, A Personal Story

    October 6, 2024
  • airalo esim italy

    Review: AirAlo ESim Card For Local Data In Foreign Countries

    September 22, 2024

15 Comments

  1. Mark Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 12:08 pm

    Easy way to get cheap LHR-JFK tickets while also avoiding a good chunk of the UK’s added fees

    • Phil Duncan Reply
      June 10, 2019 at 4:20 pm

      Not sure how you will avoid fees as they are added if your point of departure is the UK, it doesn’t matter where you buy the ticket.

  2. Phil Duncan Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 4:20 pm

    Interesting about Lufthansa.

    I was about to book a ticket with them and knew the price. Just for curiosity I went to LH IT to see if the warning about segements was there and I couldn’t see it anywhere however the same ticket was GBP100 cheaper than on the UK site for exactly the same routing.

    I’ll shop around with LH a bit more in future!

  3. AdamR Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 4:23 pm

    I’ve often wondered if it would be possible (and successful) to request a chargeback in the event an airline didn’t comply with just such a ruling. Of course, this creates work for the issuing bank, but if you have the legal proof that the airline failed to comply, that should be enough. I think the same for when airlines breach the contract of carriage, even though it’s written in their favor. Especially with the US3 having a love affair with claiming weather as the factor no matter how obtuse. Would love to hear some ideas on this and what kind of unintended side effects we’d perhaps see.

  4. Anthony Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    This is something that somebody needs to drag up to the European level and produce a European court ruling, so there can be consistency across the European Single Market — and I’m cautiously optimistic that the European Court of Justice would rule it’s legal to skip a segment. Your thoughts?

  5. ron Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 7:24 pm

    Makes good sense. In almost any other industry customers can play the arbitrage game. I see frequently good prices out of MXP like the KLM flight MXP-AMS-HAV. Easy to skip the first segment then.

  6. HoKo Reply
    June 10, 2019 at 11:16 pm

    So why don’t you be the Guinea pig and do this with AA or BA and take them to court when they cancel the rest of your itinerary. Get some precedent law on the books. That would be an amazing series of blog posts and a service to all passengers.

  7. Netman Reply
    June 11, 2019 at 8:37 pm

    Hmm so if there is a good sale out of IT to USA (or elsewhere) could nest to 2 F class tickets (or Y out/A in) ,skip the EU to USA legs and just run F from USA-EU?

    Of course this would oy work on some uke fares and deals, but interesting proposition.

    • Matthew Reply
      June 12, 2019 at 12:07 am

      That could absolutely work, in theory at least!

  8. marinela Reply
    June 12, 2019 at 12:12 pm

    Matthew,what you are saying is go ahead and break a contract with out penalty !
    Even if I don agree what the rules of the airlines,a contract is a contract! when you buy your tkt you agree to go from point A to C stoping in B ,that is what you are agree to do ,airlines calculate and sell the tkts acordly !

    • Matthew Reply
      June 12, 2019 at 12:48 pm

      I’m just sharing what Italian law allows.

  9. Martin Reply
    October 23, 2019 at 4:45 am

    Hi Matthew,
    FYI i tried this with BA (even though officially they don’t abide by this ruling) on a ticket that started in Milan-London-NYC.
    I called them to ask them to cut off first leg. They said that the AGCM ruling only applies to the return leg. ie on my flight the return flight back from NYC-LON-MI, and that if i would miss the MIL-LON leg that would automatically cancel the onward LON-NYC. They will consider MIL-LON-NYC all as one leg!
    Its interesting for two reasons.
    Firstly it seems like they were prepared to abide by the ruling, And secondly they seem to say that that the ruling only applies to a “return” portion of the trip, even if the trip is a multi city itinerary.

    Wanted to share my findings with you and ask for your thoughts.

    • Matthew Reply
      October 23, 2019 at 9:20 am

      Hi Martin, thanks for this valuable data point. That’s an interesting interpretation of the rule and seems to be how Lufthansa interprets it as well. Hopefully others will also comment on their experiences.

      I can see why airlines would try to interpret the rule in this way, though I’m not sure that is what Italy intended.

  10. tim Reply
    November 13, 2019 at 7:51 am

    Etihad now allows this as well, but their terms and conditions explictly statee the gap between the missed flight and the next flight must be at least 12 hours.

  11. Sebastian Reply
    January 4, 2021 at 9:39 pm

    Hey Matthew,

    I read about that rule in 2019 already, but never used it.

    Reading your post again now, I checked the terms and conditions of Lufthansa which you linked.

    Within those I could not find that Lufthansa states in the conditions that it would apply to those rules.
    In 3.3.3 I rather find the following:

    3.3.3. If you have chosen a tariff that requires observance of a fixed ticket sequence, please note: if carriage is not used on all individual legs or not used in the sequence specified on the ticket with otherwise unchanged travel data, we will recalculate the airfare according to your altered routing. The airfare will thereby be determined in accordance with the fare you would have had to pay for your actual routing in your price group on the day of your booking. This fare may be higher or lower than the fare you originally paid.
    If the price group you originally booked was not available for the altered routing on the day of the booking, the cheapest available former price group for your altered routing will be taken as the basis for the recalculation.

    Is it still up to date that they stick with the Italian court ruling?
    Also the spanish court had a similar ruling.
    The German court ruling seems to not allow this practice as well, but I think the Italien ruling ist stronger.
    Which of the 3 rulings would you concider more strong?

    A comparison might be an interesting article if you feel you have time and motivation for that 🙂

    All best from Germany and a happy stay here

    Sebasitan

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Search

Hot Deals for May

Note: Please see my Advertiser Disclosure

Capital One Venture X Business Card
Earn 150,000 Miles Sign Up Bonus
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card
Earn 100,000 Points
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles!
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles
Chase Ink Business Unlimited® Credit Card
Earn $750 Cash Back
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
Earn 120,000 Membership Reward® Points

Recent Posts

  • United Catering Meltdown SFO
    No Food For You: United Airlines Grappling With Catering Meltdown At SFO May 19, 2025
  • Gran Canaria Airport Shooting
    Police Fatally Shoot Knife-Wielding Teen At Gran Canaria Airport May 19, 2025
  • a living room with a view of the ocean
    Bonvoyed Again: Marriott Quietly Kills “Best Room” Promise For Elites May 19, 2025
  • Delta Sky Club ATL B Review
    Review: Delta Sky Club Atlanta (ATL) – Concourse B (Now With Grab and Go) May 19, 2025

Categories

Popular Posts

  • a room with a table and benches
    Where To Smoke At Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport (CDG) April 26, 2025
  • United Airlines Polaris Lounge Chicago Review
    Review: United Polaris Lounge Chicago (ORD) May 1, 2025
  • United Airlines Refresh Polaris Lounge Chicago
    First Look: United Airlines Reopens Renovated Polaris Lounge In Chicago (ORD) April 29, 2025
  • a hand holding a blue card
    Chase Sapphire Preferred 100K Bonus Offer Ending Soon May 2, 2025

Archives

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

As seen on:

facebook twitter instagram rss
Privacy Policy © Live and Let's Fly All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Live and Let's Fly with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.