• Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Live and Let's Fly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Home » Law In Travel » Passengers Commence Class Action Lawsuit Against Alaska Airlines For Mushroom Pilot Antics
Alaska AirlinesLaw In Travel

Passengers Commence Class Action Lawsuit Against Alaska Airlines For Mushroom Pilot Antics

Matthew Klint Posted onNovember 3, 2023November 13, 2023 7 Comments

a hand holding a scale of justice

A trio of passengers have filed a class action lawsuit against Alaska Airlines and its Horizon Air subsidiary over the antics of off-duty pilot Joseph David Emerson.

In This Post:

Toggle
  • Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Alaska Airlines + Horizon Airlines Over Off-Duty Pilot Cockpit Incident
    • Does This Case Have Merit?
    • CONCLUSION

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Alaska Airlines + Horizon Airlines Over Off-Duty Pilot Cockpit Incident

Emerson, who now faces 167 criminal charges, allegedly went berserk in the cockpit of a Horizon Air flight from Everett, Washington (PAI) to San Francisco (SFO) on October 22, 2023. In a crazed moment, he attempted to shut down the engines, placing the lives of 77 passengers at risk. He later blamed the episode on his depression, fatigue, and the mushrooms he had ingested to self-medicate.

The lawsuit, which includes three named passengers and seeks to add the remaining passengers to create a class action lawsuit, aims to:

  1. Compel a forthright public explanation from the involved airlines as to why they did not apply rigorous pre-flight security screening. Such preflight security screening could help identify pilots capable of sabotaging an aircraft,

  2. Compel airline accountability for the effects this incident has had upon the passengers, and lastly,

  3. Prevent future disasters caused by similar complacency and double standards as between ordinary passengers who are screened and before boarding and challenged before being allowed to sit in an exit-row versus highly trained flight crew, any of whom may be equally likely to suffer from mental health conditions and who have the knowledge and access to initiate a mass tragedy with their bare hands.

(that is taken verbatim)

Daniel Laurence, the attorney litigating this case, explained:

“The airlines need a wake-up call. We understand that most pilots are heroes every day for safely operating our airliners. But they are not immune from sleeplessness, drinking, drugs, or a mental health crisis. Airlines are charged with the lives of passengers and, by law, have the highest duty of care. Airlines can and should take simple and reasonable steps before each flight to challenge the presumption that every pilot who shows up at the gate is rested, sober, and in the right state of mind to fly. Emerson’s statements while in the air and shortly after his arrest show that had the airlines here done so, he would never have been allowed aboard. Our clients suffered needlessly as a result. Only luck prevented it from becoming a mass disaster.”

I take issue with that characterization of the case, which I will discuss below.

Does This Case Have Merit?

Here are the questions I am asking:

  • How can an airline reasonably be expected to screen a pilot who shows no outward signs of intoxication or depression?
  • Did the system not work exactly as it should have in preventing tragedy?

The allegation that “only luck prevented it form being a mass disaster” strikes me as quite an exaggeration. First, there was a struggle in the cockpit: the pilots of Alaska 2059 fought for control of their aircraft. Second, Emerson was restrained by flight attendants. He made another attempt to open the emergency exit door while the aircraft was diverting to Portland (PDX) but was restrained.

There was no luck here: there was skill and courage displayed by both pilots and flight attendants.

Perhaps every pilot should have to undergo a breathalyzer test prior to operating a flight, but would that have stopped this incident? A rapid-results blood test screening for other toxins is simply not tenable before every flight or duty day.

And if Emerson consumed the mushrooms shortly before the flight, he may have been perfectly “sober” when boarding and it was only in-flight that the mushrooms unexpectedly caused the psychotic incident.

I think as a nation we need to re-evaluate the way we look at mental health issues and that includes those impacting pilots. At the same time, I see no reason, at this point, to assume that Alaska or Horizon were negligent in letting Emerson into the flight deck.

The complaint alleges:

Defendants reasonably should have known of the danger Emerson presented to Flight 2059 on October 22, 2023, because Defendants should have known of the general hazards presented by unfit pilots, that the current regulatory system is only minimally effective in screening them out, and that at least some unfit pilots could be effectively detected at minimal cost and disruption to the airline’s business and profit.

This is malarkey. The idea that every pilot should be screened for drugs before every flight would crash the system…it is simply unworkable.

CONCLUSION

Passengers onboard Alaska 2059 have filed a lawsuit against Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air, alleging the carriers could have done more to stop Joseph David Emerson from attempting to crash the aircraft.

Behind the subterfuge of concerns over safety and health is a money grab. I get it. We get it. And I expect Alaska Airlines will settle and each passenger will receive a generous payout.

But it seems to me that instead of saying the system failed we should be celebrating that the system worked: that a pilot with a death wish was stopped by both pilot and flight attendants. No system is foolproof, but it seems like our system works rather well in its current form…

Get Daily Updates

Join our mailing list for a daily summary of posts! We never sell your info.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Previous Article Stoned “Runway Model” Chases Down Qantas Plane On Tarmac
Next Article I’m Homeless And Living In Hotels…

About Author

Matthew Klint

Matthew is an avid traveler who calls Los Angeles home. Each year he travels more than 200,000 miles by air and has visited more than 135 countries. Working both in the aviation industry and as a travel consultant, Matthew has been featured in major media outlets around the world and uses his Live and Let's Fly blog to share the latest news in the airline industry, commentary on frequent flyer programs, and detailed reports of his worldwide travel.

Related Posts

  • United Airlines CEO Duffy

    United Airlines CEO Heaps Praise On “Gold Star” Transportation Secretary Duffy

    May 12, 2025
  • Trump Air Traffic Control

    Trump’s Air Traffic Control Plan Needs Refinement, But It’s Progress

    May 10, 2025
  • Scott Kirby Newark Airport Slot Controls

    United Airlines CEO Says Newark Airport Is Safe—But There’s Just One Problem

    May 7, 2025

7 Comments

  1. Matthew Reply
    November 3, 2023 at 10:22 am

    The fact that lawyers are already circling when not all the facts are known tells you everything you need to know about what is wrong with this country. The system worked as you say. If you want zero risk of every permutation in life, don’t ever get in an Uber, or get on a shuttle bus, or let someone else drive. Get a life people

  2. Scott Schultz Reply
    November 3, 2023 at 11:04 am

    My wife and I were living in the UK for a couple of years (2020-2022.) I always got asked the same question. Why is America so “sue happy.” Most of the time I just responded with “People are just looking for a quick buck.” Which is true some of the time, but there are justified times where lawsuits are necessary. I just don’t think it’s as prevalent elsewhere as much as the US.

  3. Cy Reply
    November 3, 2023 at 11:26 am

    Okay, yes it’s a money grab. But why are off duty pilots even allowed in the flight deck to begin with? They have no reason to be there. That seem to be the issue to me

    • Matthew Klint Reply
      November 3, 2023 at 11:33 am

      I think it’s reasonable when the cabin is full and they need to get from A to B. Think about it, in most situations the extra set of eyes and knowledge could be an asset rather than a liability in case of emergency.

      And a heads up to you—my last post today is on Israel. I appreciate that we don’t share the same views on the conflict and trust we can again discuss the matter with mutual respect.

      • Cy Reply
        November 3, 2023 at 11:51 am

        Appreciate the last point and agree. Discussing these things online always tends to inflame opinions and things that would be laughed off over drinks in person get viewed in a different light.

        I’m guessing if we were discussing the topic in person over coffee, wine or beer we’d find much
        more we agree on then we disagree on. If ever in Phoenix with a few extra hours let me know and we can test my theory.

        Cheers.

      • BDAGuy Reply
        November 5, 2023 at 12:21 pm

        Couldn’t disagree more. The cockpit is not a dead-heading crew space. A cockpit is secured for a reason: safety, which in this case was compromised. While I don’t believe a lawsuit settles “pun intended” anything in this situation, clearly the policy of allowing dead-heading crew to sit in the cockpit needs to be revisited.

  4. derek Reply
    November 3, 2023 at 4:32 pm

    When a United DC-10 crashed in 1987 or so, it was an off duty pilot allowed in the cockpit thatsaved 100 lives. He adjusted the engine throttles while kneeling.

    The lawsuit should be dismissed. Sue Joseph Emerson.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Search

Hot Deals for May

Note: Please see my Advertiser Disclosure

Capital One Venture X Business Card
Earn 150,000 Miles Sign Up Bonus
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card
Earn 100,000 Points
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles!
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles
Chase Ink Business Unlimited® Credit Card
Earn $750 Cash Back
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
Earn 120,000 Membership Reward® Points

Recent Posts

  • New Polaris Seats United Airlines
    Sliding Into Polaris Studio: My First Impressions Of United’s Newest Seat May 14, 2025
  • United Flight Attendant Polaris Protest
    Flight Attendants Try To Upstage United Polaris Media Event: A First-Hand Perspective May 14, 2025
  • Delta Air Lines A321neo Economy Class Review
    Review: Delta Air Lines A321neo Economy Class May 14, 2025
  • Israel Flight Cancellations
    Major Carriers Extend Flight Cancellations To Israel: Here’s The List May 14, 2025

Categories

Popular Posts

  • a room with a table and benches
    Where To Smoke At Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport (CDG) April 26, 2025
  • United Airlines Polaris Lounge Chicago Review
    Review: United Polaris Lounge Chicago (ORD) May 1, 2025
  • United Airlines Refresh Polaris Lounge Chicago
    First Look: United Airlines Reopens Renovated Polaris Lounge In Chicago (ORD) April 29, 2025
  • a hand holding a blue card
    Chase Sapphire Preferred 100K Bonus Offer Ending Soon May 2, 2025

Archives

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

As seen on:

facebook twitter instagram rss
Privacy Policy © Live and Let's Fly All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Live and Let's Fly with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.