American Airlines’ catering problems at London Heathrow appear to be getting worse, not better. What began as an unexplained disruption has now turned into a full-blown service breakdown on some of the airline’s most important routes.
American Airlines London Heathrow Catering Problems Continue As Long-Term Fix Remains Unclear
As I previously reported, American Airlines has been experiencing significant catering disruptions on flights departing London Heathrow (LHR).
Instead of loading meals locally in London, American has been “double catering” flights from the United States, meaning food for both the outbound and return journey is being loaded at the U.S. origin airport.
Aircraft galleys simply are not designed to hold two full long-haul catering loads. As a result, service levels have been dramatically reduced in every cabin.
Reports from passengers and crew indicate that:
- Premium cabins are receiving simplified “single tray” meal service
- Meal choices have been reduced to a protein or vegetarian option
- Pre-ordered meals are often not being honored
- Some premium cabin items like ice cream have been removed entirely
Premium catering may be a first world problem, but these London routes are some of American’s most important and lucrative routes, including services to New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Dallas, and Miami.
And yet right now the onboard experience resembles a pandemic-era service downgrade with no end in site.
AA has also failed to provide details on what is going on beyond an internal memo to flight attendants that it is “making temporary adjustments” to catering in LHR “due to a disruption in our catering operations.”
The disruption appears tied to American’s catering provider at Heathrow, dnata, although the exact cause of the breakdown remains murky. A widely-circulated photo by JonNYC suggested a rodent concern involving the catering facility, although dnata has strongly denied those allegations and says its operations continue to meet food safety standards.
Whatever the precise trigger, the operational workaround is clearly not sustainable…
Could American Airlines Switch To DO & CO At Heathrow?
If American Airlines ultimately decides to move away from dnata in London, one logical long-term option would be DO & CO.
The Austrian catering company already operates a major facility at Heathrow and provides inflight meals for several premium airlines, including British Airways on its Heathrow departures. That connection is particularly relevant because British Airways and American Airlines operate a transatlantic joint venture across the Atlantic and heavily sell one another’s flights.
Not only does DO & CO already work with BA (and Iberia) at LHR, but it it generally very highly regarded as a quality supplier.
Of course, switching to DO & CO would not automatically solve American’s catering issues. The quality of airline food ultimately comes down to budget. Even the best caterer cannot produce great meals if the airline is unwilling to pay for them.
But if American is looking for operational stability in London, partnering with the same catering provider as its joint-venture partner would at least make strategic sense…
The Bigger Issue: Heathrow Is Too Important For This To Continue
The real problem here is not just the food itself.
London Heathrow is one of American Airlines’ most important international markets. These routes carry a mix of high-value business travelers, premium leisure passengers, and connecting traffic across Europe and beyond.
This is supposed to be the airline’s flagship international network.
The temporary contingency plan in place for a week now might be understandable for a day or two during a unforeseen disruption, but the longer this situation drags on, the harder it becomes to explain to customers paying thousands of dollars for a business class ticket why they are receiving meals that look like this:

Of course every cloud has a silver lining and it seems that despite boxed wines and Cava replacing Champagne, the pre-arrival meals have improved:

CONCLUSION
American Airlines’ Heathrow catering disruption may have begun as a temporary operational issue, but it is quickly turning into a reputational problem, precisely at a time the carrier cannot afford such slip-ups as it tries to better compete against Delta Air Lines and United Airlines.
Flying meals across the Atlantic to cover both directions of a flight is a clever short-term workaround, but it inevitably leads to reduced service levels and unhappy passengers. If American wants to restore confidence in its flagship transatlantic routes, it will need a stable long-term catering solution in London.
Whether that means repairing its relationship with dnata or exploring alternatives like DO & CO, one thing is clear: American cannot afford for this situation to continue.



Agree – it’s one thing for a day or two, at this point break whatever contract you have with dnata, deal with the consequences later, and subcontract with Do&Co through your alliance partner BA or whomever. Only 16-18 flights a day or whatever from LHR but they’re premium flights – can’t let this continue any longer.
Meanwhile, I thought they’d unveil a livery for Trump the day before the FAA ORD meeting, but I was wrong, it was today right after the meeting – huge America250 on the livery, now an official sponsor of the organization, plus: “American will serve as the Official Airline of America Innovates, a traveling showcase of the nation’s ingenuity that will highlight the creativity, progress and pioneering spirit that have defined the United States for 250 years.” The sponsor of America Innovates is Leidos. Connect whatever dots you’d like, but it’s a smart political move from American.
Surprised it still goes on and AA is not doing any damage control. The routes to London are usually a cash cow for any airline and with lots of choices travelers might now avoid AA – not that the meal is the most important part but I will change my flight next month if there isn’t any solution in sight.
And AA continues to remain silent on the issue…
How are these meals not considered spoiled and unservable on the return flight? At a certain other major US carrier, the entire meal supply is recatered if a flight is delayed longer than 3 hours. Chillers can only do so much. You’re taking a meal that’s cooked a few hours before the originating segment, flying it 6-10 hours across the Atlantic, turning the aircraft for 2 hours, then serving the food approximately 1 hour after that. This meal was made probably at least 12 hours earlier and we’re expected to believe that it’s safe to eat? Does your ticket come with a nice bout of food poisoning are does that cost extra?
AA flight attendants and pilots seem to have lost confidence in CEO Robert Isom… But what about the passengers?
Many years ago, Pan Am used to fly from New York to Tokyo via Fairbanks with a crew change, and no catering there. Yet, in very tight 707 galleys, they somehow managed to double provision for two 8 hour flights ex JFK and HND. Yes, triple stacking trays and belly loading perishables which were brought up to the cabin during the technical stop. Same thing on 747 flights from HNL to SYD via Samoa. Double stacked trays in the galley and entree’s belly loaded in cold containers. Imagine a world in which somebody at AA could come up with the same idea for double provisioning ex JFK for the London flights during this disaster. Dah !!
Greetings to the cherished memory of the amazing Pan Am!
Meanwhile, the arch-rival DL is making some key changes to its leadership team. CEO Ed Bastian remains in his position. ↓
https://www.reuters.com/business/delta-reshuffles-top-ranks-cfo-janki-moves-coo-carter-president-2026-03-05/
I may write about this – I’m not sure this is a big deal.
it isn’t a big deal as much as some people want to hope it indicates weakness.
DL’s exec team is older and has more seniority at DL than AA and esp. UA.
People retire, older leaders move into new positions, younger people move into the leadership structure.
They would have to be the absolute cheapest option to continue to do this without losing customers. Personally, I much prefer VS and BA. BA used to have really awful food until they switched to DO&CO, and now they are much better than any of the US airlines.
I travelled on AA business yesterday LHR to MIA. The overall catering and level of service was terrible and AA should literally be ashamed of themselves. It wasn’t just one thing. but multiple things which ended up being by far the worst experience I have had with them in a long time.
The meals were like having bad economy class meals and the quality of the food was really bad. In addition they had no snacks or anything like that onboard at all. For a company that has over $50 billion in gross revenue it is shameful that they can’t get their act together here. Do NOT fly out of LHR until they get this resolved, unless they are cutting their fares down very considerably. It’s just not worth it.
AA closely resembles America these days. Overpriced, and poor value for money in general. All very short changed.
I know united is watching with a smile on its face lol
UA is far smaller than BA or DL/VS at LHR.
Given that BA and AA are in a JV which is based on shared capacity, BA is likely to benefit the most but there “will be discussions” about revenue sharing when service has been degraded.
DL/VS are likely benefitting the most given AA and DL/VS’s similar overlap in the southern tier of the US and in common hubs such as JFK which UA does not even serve.
…still feels better than the catering outta Doha… DOH!
Americans have moved away from a number of tasty proteins because we are suspicious of the high sodium and additives from the Chinese takeover of Smithfield and rightfully so. But BA offered a few local varieties of him escaping this pollution. Quality beef prices will never be affordable again, even for premium seats. We need to reintroduce America to other quality proteins. And yes I understand for some this is religious but not all of us. Catering needs to be affordable. Let’s find delicious again.