• Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Live and Let's Fly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Home » TSA » Picture of the Week #11: The Terrorists Have Won
TSA

Picture of the Week #11: The Terrorists Have Won

Matthew Klint Posted onNovember 17, 2010November 14, 2023 9 Comments

I know, I know. The “terrorists” can dress up as nuns. Or children. Or seniors.

But pictures like the one below just make me sad (even if it is a few years old).

a woman in a nun's robe kneeling on her knees

photo courtesy: Flicker user Morning in America

Sadly, a new CBS poll out today suggests that 81% of Americans approve the use of full body scanners. We’ve got a lot of work to do.

Get Daily Updates

Join our mailing list for a daily summary of posts! We never sell your info.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Previous Article Why the 2011 United/Continental Elite Program Isn’t the End of the World
Next Article My Solution to the Full Body Scanner Dilemma: TSA Explosives Detection Canine Team

About Author

Matthew Klint

Matthew is an avid traveler who calls Los Angeles home. Each year he travels more than 200,000 miles by air and has visited more than 135 countries. Working both in the aviation industry and as a travel consultant, Matthew has been featured in major media outlets around the world and uses his Live and Let's Fly blog to share the latest news in the airline industry, commentary on frequent flyer programs, and detailed reports of his worldwide travel.

Related Posts

  • 106-Year-Old TSA

    106-Year-Old Has A Bone To Pick With The TSA

    April 7, 2025
  • Abolish TSA

    Abolish TSA? Privatize Airport Security? How About We Start With Eliminating Liquid Ban…

    March 28, 2025
  • PIT TSA Precheck Global entry delays

    Do You Need A Real ID To Fly? May 7th Deadline Approaching

    March 23, 2025

9 Comments

  1. Marcus Reply
    November 17, 2010 at 3:43 am

    I’ve been shocked by the number of people who think that the full body scanners are no big deal. I really thought it would have been 80% the other way. Glad I didn’t put money on that one…

  2. Nick Reply
    November 17, 2010 at 5:26 am

    All of the discussion just keeps reminding of a wonderful quote from Benjamin Franklin: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

  3. kalin Reply
    December 6, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    TSA: “oh by the way you get blasted by radiation each time you go through our scanners, no biggie”

  4. Michael D Reply
    December 6, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    Radiation is scary because we all know that radiation causes cancer and cancer is a scary thing. But the radiation you receive from the scanners is less than the radiation you receive from one hour of flying at +30k ft. This doesn’t justify the TSA from irradiating everyone. But if you are afraid that the radiation from the scanners is going to cause you harm then you should really be terrified of flying.

  5. Matthew Reply
    December 7, 2010 at 2:23 pm

    @Michael D: That is undeniably true, but why make it worse through unnecessary and obtrusive screening?

  6. Michael D Reply
    December 7, 2010 at 4:00 pm

    Mathematically you can subtract the increase in your odds of getting cancer from flying from that of flying plus being scanned but your body cannot. It is like saying you feel better about the injuries you will receive from a car accident going 100 but not 101 mph or 1 vs 1.01 mph. Yes the higher speed will be mathematically “worse” but your body will not be able to tell the difference.

    Using the hysteria associated with radiation and cancer as a reason to stop the TSA from using those scanners is illogical and unethical. The TSA may not be a logical and ethical organization. But that doesn’t justify the argument that the scanners should not be used because of the radiation danger.

  7. Matthew Reply
    December 7, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Michael, I emphatically disagree with your analysis. The bottom line question is this–can the radiation from the full body scanners be harmful to your health?

    Many doctors seem to think so.

    http://upgrd.com/matthew/more-backlash-over-tsas-body-scanners.html

    Are the machines necessary?

    No, for the reasons I have argued ad naseum.

    Therefore, there is no justification for even a “micro”mental increase in radiation exposure–and that is not hysteria.

  8. Michael D Reply
    December 8, 2010 at 12:01 am

    There is no doubt that radiation is harmful. But a one hour flight exposes you to 10 times the radiation of the scanners. If you think the scan’s radiation will harm you then the one hour flight will harm you ten times as much.

    Those doctors say that low energy x-rays do not penetrate the body and deposit their energy in the skin. Even lower level energy x-rays (17-23keV and 3,000 times the amount of radiation as the scanners) are routinely used for mammography and they manage to penetrate at least 7 cm of tissue to expose the x-ray film. So who is correct? The “experts” or the x-ray film? X-rays which are lower in energy do not penetrate as deeply as higher energy x-rays. Higher energy x-rays cause more damage than lower energy x-rays. These are physical facts known since the discovery of x-rays.

    If you want to say that the TSA has no right irradiating you, then I agree. If you want to say that the amount of radiation you are receiving in the scans is going to measurably increase the odds of you getting cancer given that you are going to take a one hour flight then you are wrong.

    Four doctors writing a letter to the President’s science advisor in April is not “many doctors” thinking so. In fact these four are the only ones I can find who are saying it is dangerous.

    With 200k miles flying you have received more than twice the limit of the current acceptable level of radiation (discounting any solar event which you might have been flying in). This is not really pertinent to the argument just FYI.

  9. Matthew Reply
    December 8, 2010 at 12:23 am

    I get your argument, but just because something is bad doesn’t mean that a little more “bad” won’t hurt or is acceptable. I may enjoy smoking (actually I hate cigarettes) and voluntarily smoke a pack of cigs each day, but that doesn’t mean the government can smoke one more in my face.

    RE: The Four UC Doctors

    They called for an independent panel of experts to review all the risk data including whether the scanners pose a higher risk to certain folks like pregnant women, seniors, children, and teens.

    The government declined their request, reiterating that the scans are safe for everyone. “The imaging machine was independently tested, and these studies have shown that the radiation dose is far below the standards set for safety,” says TSA spokesperson Nick Kimball.

    Why did the gov’t decline the request? Do you trust Uncle Sam that much? The WikiLeaks scandal should give us pause…

Leave a Reply to Michael D Cancel reply

Search

Hot Deals for May

Note: Please see my Advertiser Disclosure

Capital One Venture X Business Card
Earn 150,000 Miles Sign Up Bonus
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card
Earn 100,000 Points
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles!
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles
Chase Ink Business Unlimited® Credit Card
Earn $750 Cash Back
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
Earn 120,000 Membership Reward® Points

Recent Posts

  • a seat in a plane
    Last Time To Fly In Lufthansa First Class? May 10, 2025
  • Denver Airport Business Class
    $19K Business Class…On Your Dime: Denver Airport Execs Take Luxury Jaunt To Spain May 9, 2025
  • Pre-Departure Beverage Economy
    Pre-Departure Beverage…In Economy Class?! May 9, 2025
  • Breeze Airways A220
    My First Time Flying Breeze Airways: Friendly, Fashionable, But Filthy… May 9, 2025

Categories

Popular Posts

  • a room with a table and benches
    Where To Smoke At Paris Charles De Gaulle Airport (CDG) April 26, 2025
  • United Airlines Polaris Lounge Chicago Review
    Review: United Polaris Lounge Chicago (ORD) May 1, 2025
  • United Airlines Refresh Polaris Lounge Chicago
    First Look: United Airlines Reopens Renovated Polaris Lounge In Chicago (ORD) April 29, 2025
  • a hand holding a blue card
    Chase Sapphire Preferred 100K Bonus Offer Ending Soon May 2, 2025

Archives

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

As seen on:

facebook twitter instagram rss
Privacy Policy © Live and Let's Fly All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Live and Let's Fly with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.