Check out this letter from Captain Ed Bates, president of the Allied Pilots Association (APA), which represents 11,000 American Airlines pilots:
In response to increased threats to civil aviation around the world, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has implemented the use of Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) body scanners at some airport locations.
While I’m sure that each of us recognizes that the threats to our lives are real, the practice of airport security screening of airline pilots has spun out of control and does nothing to improve national security. It’s long past time that policymakers take the steps necessary to exempt commercial pilots from airport security screening and grant designated pilot access to SIDA utilizing either Crew Pass or biometric identification. As I recently wrote to the TSA Administrator:
"Our pilots are highly motivated partners in the effort to protect our nation’s security, with many of us serving as Federal Flight Deck Officers. We are all keenly aware that we may serve as the last line of defense against another terrorist attack on commercial aviation. Rather than being viewed as potential threats, we should be treated commensurate with the authority and responsibility that we are vested with as professional pilots."
It is important to note that there are "backscatter" AIT devices now being deployed that produce ionizing radiation, which could be harmful to your health. Airline pilots in the United States already receive higher doses of radiation in their on-the-job environment than nearly every other category of worker in the United States, including nuclear power plant employees. As I also stated in my recent letter to the Administrator of the TSA:
"We are exposed to radiation every day on the job. For example, a typical Atlantic crossing during a solar flare can expose a pilot to radiation equivalent to 100 chest X-rays per hour. Requiring pilots to go through the AIT means additional radiation exposure. I share our pilots’ concerns about this additional radiation exposure and plan to recommend that our pilots refrain from going through the AIT. We already experience significantly higher radiation exposure than most other occupations, and there is mounting evidence of higher-than-average cancer rates as a consequence."
It’s safe to say that most of the APA leadership shares my view that no pilot at American Airlines should subject themselves to the needless privacy invasion and potential health risks caused by the AIT body scanners. I therefore recommend that the pilots of American Airlines consider the following guidelines:
Use designated crew lines if available.
Politely decline AIT exposure and request alternative screening.
There is absolutely no denying that the enhanced pat-down is a demeaning experience. In my view, it is unacceptable to submit to one in public while wearing the uniform of a professional airline pilot. I recommend that all pilots insist that such screening is performed in an out-of-view area to protect their privacy and dignity.
If screening delays your arrival at the cockpit, do not cut corners that jeopardize the safety of the flight. Consummate professionalism and safety are always paramount.
Maintain composure and professionalism at all times and recognize that you are probably being videotaped.
If you feel that you have been treated with less than courtesy, respect and professionalism, please submit an observer report to APA. Please be sure to include the time, date, security checkpoint and name of the TSA employee who performed the screening. Avoid confrontation.
Your APA Board of Directors and National Officers are holding a conference call this week to discuss these issues and further guidance may be forthcoming.
While I cannot promise results tomorrow, I pledge to dedicate APA resources in the days and weeks to come to achieve direct access to SIDA for the pilots of American Airlines. In the meantime, I am confident that you will continue to exhibit your usual utmost professionalism as you safely operate and protect our nation’s air transport system.
While I would like to see Captain Bates argue against AIT screening for all passengers, I wholeheartedly agree with the absurdity of subjecting pilots to the TSA’s invasive screening methods. As he stated, "There is absolutely no denying that the enhanced pat-down is a demeaning experience. In my view, it is unacceptable to submit to one in public while wearing the uniform of a professional airline pilot. I recommend that all pilots insist that such screening is performed in an out-of-view area to protect their privacy and dignity."
And I recommend that all passengers do the same. With Captain Bates’ letter and the recent ExpressJet pilot incident, at least one interest group is pushing back.
It will be very interesting to see how the TSA responds to this letter.
Isn’t enhanced screening of pilots somewhat silly, though? After all, they don’t need to bring anything with them to take out a plane.
And if Disney responds to the letter at the following link, we may have another group against the new procedures: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/krolman1.1.1.html
Oh that is right — in America where entitlement is everything… except to the rules for you…and you oh and your group too. So lets just profile and only screen people of a certain profile or all the schlep’s in economy cabin or of a certain fare amount. Hmmm… makes perfect sense. 1 4 all and all 4 1.
May be we should only screen those of certain weight oh or profession… or may be middle class and below?
Everyone has a choice… cooperate or “pat down” or fly private or change professions.
@Paul (Except 4 me): Did you miss the part where I said, “While I would like to see Captain Bates argue against AIT screening for all passengers…”?
I am not making an argument for profiling, I am making an argument that no one should be subjected to AIT. If this goal is realized incrementally, then so be it. Pilots, the ones who are trusted to the fly planes and can take those planes and use them as destructive weapons, cannot even be trusted at a security checkpoint? Why should they have to go through a nude-o-scope or pat down? Just because all the other suckers do? Is that your vision of an egalitarian society?
Did you read my response to your comment in my last TSA post? AIT is not tested and may not even be able to pick up the very explosive materials that the machines have been purchased to protect us against.
If your gripe about “American entitlement” is that we don’t like being subjected to capricious government searches, then I guess I am guilty as charged.
A government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people should not treat its own citizens as criminals through security protocols that are not even published for “national security” reasons. That is the hallmark of a police state.
It is you, amigo, who is whining.
@Mark L: Exactly!