• Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Live and Let's Fly
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Flight Reviews
    • Hotel Reviews
    • Lounge Reviews
    • Trip Reports
  • About
    • Press
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Award Expert
Home  >  Analysis • Coronavirus  >  A Scientific Basis For Blocking Middle Seats On Airplanes
AnalysisCoronavirus

A Scientific Basis For Blocking Middle Seats On Airplanes

Matthew Klint Posted onJuly 9, 2020July 9, 2020 12 Comments

We often debate the viability, practically, and benefit of social distancing on airplanes. But what does the science say blocking middle seats?

The Science Behind Social Distancing + Middle Seat Blocking Onboard Airplanes

Live and Let’s Fly has a wide readership, including in the scientific community. One reader took the time to write a very thoughtful note and detailed argument for why social distancing, even if it is only an open middle seats, does play an important role in slowing the spread of virus.

I’m not a scientist and I have no way, beyond applying my layman knowledge of the subject, to critically review the argument below. But I present you excerpts from the letter, which is certainly worthy of our consideration.

First, the scientist established their credentials, also expressing “concern that you are inadvertently misleading your readers about the risk factors associated with the lack of in-flight social distancing.”

The issue is not whether six feet of social distancing is possible, but whether blocked middle seats provide enough additional protection to justify keeping them open.

I agree with you that it is impossible to maintain six feet social distancing on planes. I also agree with you that airlines will lose money on every flight if they block middle seats and maintain the current fares, and it is unreasonable to shame airlines for selling their flights full in a competitive marketplace where customers will just book with your competitors if you charge a 50% premium for social distancing.

I strongly disagree that there is no value in blocking middle seats; in fact I would strongly advocate that all airlines be forced to block middle seats, either through public pressure or a federal mandate. I would hope that this would create upward pressure on prices, especially since the reduced demand currently present is comprised of travelers who really need to travel and thus likely less sensitive to prices. I would be open to increased government aid as well. But since you have a large readership, hopefully people like you can do your part in better informing customers so that they can vote with their wallet and pressure United and American to match Delta in blocking middle seats.

I am not trying to raise any hysteria. I myself flew multiple times during the pandemic to see loved ones. I understand that airplanes are actually one of the safest environments among various modes of mass transportation. They have clean filtered air that flows from top to bottom, and the rate of circulation is high enough that the viral load is significantly reduced even in the presence of an infected patient. But right now, all mass transportation poses a significant risk, airplanes included.

Here’s the key part that I think you are missing: social distancing is not a binary between six feet or nothing. We have some decent data on the efficacy of various levels of social distancing, and we also have research on how viruses spread within airplanes. Because of the air flow pattern in an airplane, only passengers in close proximity to an infected passenger are significantly at risk (unless he or she has some other close interaction during in-flight service or boarding).

A good rule of thumb is that infection risk seems to approximately fall by half with every 0.5 meters of distance. So the seat next to you at 0.5 meters is twice the risk of the one at 1.0 meters, and generally speaking, about 1.5 meters of social distancing seems barely enough to mitigate the spread of the virus enough so that it does not spread exponentially.

So let’s pick an example: a 737 jet with 32-inch seat pitch and 17.5-inch wide seats and a 20-inch aisle.

1. Delta, 60% capacity, window seats:

0 person at 0.0~0.5m (x4), 2.7 persons at 0.5~1.0m (x2), 1.8 persons at 1.0~1.5m
= equivalent of 7.2 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance

2. Delta, 60% capacity, aisle seats:

0 person at 0.0~0.5m (x4), 3.6 persons at 0.5~1.0m (x2), 3.6 persons at 1.0~1.5m
= equivalent of 10.8 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance

3. United, 100% capacity, window seats:

1 person at 0.0~0.5m (x4), 5 persons at 0.5~1.0m (x2), 2 persons at 1.0~1.5m
= equivalent of 16 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance

4. United, 100% capacity, aisle seats:

1 person at 0.0~0.5m (x4), 6 persons at 0.5~1.0m (x2), 5 persons at 1.0~1.5m
= equivalent of 21 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance

5. United, 100% capacity, middle seats:

2 persons at 0.0~0.5m (x4), 6 persons at 0.5~1.0m (x2), 1 persons at 1.0~1.5m
= equivalent of 21 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance

Thus, an average Delta customer faces the risk equivalent of 9 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance, and an average United customer faces the risk equivalent of 19.3 persons at 1.0~1.5m distance. An average United customer faces more than twice as much risk on board as an average Delta customer. You might think a factor of two is not significant, but because an epidemic grows exponentially, a factor of two can make the difference between an exploding epidemic and a decaying one. If the R0 value [basic reproduction number] of COVID-19 is around 2.5, and universal mask wearing cuts the risk factor a bit (even if planes are slightly higher risk than the average environment), further reduction by another factor of two can bring the R value below 1.0, and we know that exponents below 1.0 eventually decay to zero.

This is obviously a very rough back-of-the-envelope calculation intended to be an illustrative example, but proper researchers in the field have run much more sophisticated epidemics models with real-world statistics and computer simulations.

More Resources On The Science Behind Middle Seat Blocking

The scientist recommended two further sources to explore this issue:

  • Scientists know ways to help stop viruses from spreading on airplanes. They’re too late for this pandemic.
  • At least 3 feet of social distancing likely reduces COVID-19 spread, study confirms

This morning, I also happened to read another story on this topic in ZDnet which chronicles the research of MIT scholar Arnold Barnett and makes many of the arguments made above. It also helps to explain risk:

The average risk of catching COVID-19 from flying on a plane is 1 in 4,300, according to Barnett’s model. That rate is roughly double the risk if airlines were to leave the middle seat open, 1 in 7,700, Barnett estimates. Using a relatively low fatality rate of 1% of all people who contract COVID-19, he estimates, means that the 1 in 4,300 risk of catching COVID-19 turns into a risk of dying from the disease of 1 in 430,000. That is much more likely than the standard measure of risk of dying by airplane crash, which is 1 in 34 million.

Does a risk level of this nature even matter?

With 200,000 passengers per day being carried by the major U.S. airlines over the next three months, a total of perhaps 18 million passengers will be carried in the U.S. at the current rate of bookings, he explained. Going from the 1 in 7,700 Covid-19 risk per passenger with the middle seat filled to just 1 in 4,300 with it empty would avert 1,800 Covid-19 infections, he argues, and 18 potential deaths at a fatality rate of 1%.

Using a value of $9 million for a human life, which is a figure described by Boston University researcher Austin Frakt as roughly the value U.S. government agencies use, the dollar equivalent of the 18 lost lives would be about $173 million.

“It is hard to imagine that the cost to American Airlines and United of averting those deaths would be anywhere near $173 million in the coming months,” Barnett said.

The entire article is quite interesting:

  • Filling middle seats nearly doubles airline passenger risk of catching COVID-19, says MIT researcher

CONCLUSION

It is my goal to always use my platform of Live and Let’s Fly in a responsible manner. I’ve long discounted the benefit of leaving middle seats opens, but we clearly see that our calculus should not be six feet or nothing. Instead, we must continue to weigh risks and note the likely incremental benefits of even a few inches. I’m still not ready to advocate for mandatory middle seat blocking. But my continuing research on the matter is helping me–and will hopefully help you–more smartly think about this topic.

image: Emirates

Previous Article Korean Air Receives Multimillion-Dollar Loan…From U.S. Taxpayers
Next Article JetBlue Will Build Sizable LAX Base, Abandon Long Beach

About Author

Matthew Klint

Matthew is an avid traveler who calls Los Angeles home. Each year he travels more than 200,000 miles by air and has visited more than 135 countries. Working both in the aviation industry and as a travel consultant, Matthew has been featured in major media outlets around the world and uses his Live and Let's Fly blog to share the latest news in the airline industry, commentary on frequent flyer programs, and detailed reports of his worldwide travel.

Related Posts

  • United Airlines 2023 MileagePlus Devaluation

    Massive United Airlines Devaluation: What To Do Now

    May 17, 2023
  • United Airlines Denounces Delta Air Lines’ Haneda Slot Proposal As A “Self-Serving Scheme”

    May 9, 2023
  • Exciting: How United Airlines Is Genuinely Improving Onboard Service

    May 8, 2023

12 Comments

  1. Jack Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 12:00 pm

    Very interesting. It does seem the main talking points around blocking middle seats has been “6 feet or bust” and therefore blocking middle seats provides no value since it’s not 6 feet. I’m sure Kirby has a spreadsheet somewhere which can counter this analysis.

  2. Gary Leff Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 12:16 pm

    Jf the standard is whether there is “no value in blocking middle seats” then of course advocates for middle seat blocking win. A traveler might wind up sitting directly next to someone with the virus, sharing an armrest, get coughed on, etc.

    The question is how much actual risk of spread is there on an aircraft, and how much of that risk is reduced by middle seat blocking. The answer seems to be not very much total risk (flights haven’t been identified as a significant vector of spread), so reducing risk a little bit probably shouldn’t be a public policy priority.

    We face risk tradeoff decisions every day. You can get into a car accident driving. People drown in buckets every year. It sure seems like restaurants at 50% capacity in some states are a much greater risk than middle seats, as are gyms which are open in several states. Seems like we ought to focus there first.

    In normal times we know that air travel is much safer than driving, so higher fares which push people onto the roads cost lives. If taking 1/3 of seats out of supply increases price, would people substitute driving for flying and lead to worse public health outcomes even?

    We can grant that ‘blocking middle seat is better than not blocking middle seat’ in terms of first-order effects without respect to cost, but if that were true then “going full Wuhan” would be the preferred policy stance with respect to the virus…

    • Matthew Klint Reply
      July 9, 2020 at 12:21 pm

      I thought 1300 words was enough already for my post, but you make the same arguments I would (and have in other posts). Indeed, virtually every activity in life is a cost-benefit analysis. And even with unknown variables, I would sit in a middle seat today and don’t think the analysis above justifies compulsory middle seat blocking, though the $$ figures do merit further discussion.

      • Tiffany Marra Reply
        July 16, 2020 at 8:52 am

        I appreciate your willingness to explore alternative explanations that challenge your beliefs. I wish more people did the same!

  3. Stuart Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 12:53 pm

    Wow. Great post and analysis.

  4. derek Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 3:05 pm

    I am not flying for now. If I had to, as painful and expensive as it would be, I would buy 9 seats in a 737 for me. If airlines cooperated, it could be cut to 6 seats if they grouped like minded people together (empty row in front and behind a passenger)

    • Cinimo Reply
      July 9, 2020 at 4:42 pm

      The CDC best estimate for death rate from Covid-19 is 0.26%. This is a quarter of the 1% used in the article. If this is true, how does that change the calculations?

      I don’t have much knowledge about the real costs for United or American for running extra flights, but I don’t understand the justification for $173m being less than the cost. Some quick calculations: 18m passengers, so if middle seat is blocked that’s 6m extra flight seats which means on middle seat blocked flights a total of about 45,000 extra flights. Which gives the cost per flight ($173m / 45,000) as $3,800. This sounds very low to me.

      Of course, this assumes the flights are all 100% full. However if the flights are not 100% full the risk per flight is already reduced so the extra deaths will be lower already, I’m sure the calculations can be done to see what the overall effect is…

  5. ValTN Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 3:05 pm

    Airborne transmission, via aerosols & droplets, is one of the (strongly) suspected mechanisms. Due to the circulation patterns of the ambient air, the “added risk” due to this mechanism could be anywhere between 1X – 4X when the nominal distance between passengers is doubled, given all other factors remain the same. So an increased risk factor of 2X is reasonable.

    There has been a lot of research, both observational as well as simulation studies of droplet spread, in Japan. Here is a recent news item from The Japan Times (video not in English): https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/07/08/national/japan-supercomputer-coronavirus-closed-spaces/

  6. emercycrite Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 9:16 pm

    Interesting read.

  7. derek Reply
    July 9, 2020 at 11:19 pm

    I know that I once flew on a A320 sitting next to a woman coughing like mad on a ORD-IAD flight. I tried to turn my face away and lean my head into the aisle. Two days later, I was coughing like mad. It was the common cold, not influenza.

  8. stogieguy7 Reply
    July 10, 2020 at 11:30 am

    With this particular pandemic, I am reluctant to fly. And the biggest reason is that being crammed into an airplane isn’t your only challenge. While on the plane, you have some control regarding your liklihood of catching COVID: wear a mask, use hand sanitizer, stay in your limited area, try not to touch anything. You can plan for this. And the airlines are sanitizing like crazy.

    It’s at the airport that your greatest risk lies, in my opinion. These tend to be germy places to begin with. The TSA screening area, gate areas, etc. see thousands of people every day. If you have ever caught a cold or illness on a trip, there’s a good chance that you may have caught it in one of these places. And having to potentially spend hours waiting around at the airport is a very unappealing concept to me.

  9. Dave Reply
    July 12, 2020 at 12:22 pm

    ‘The scientist’ Lol

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Search

Hot Deals for May

Note: Please see my Advertiser Disclosure

Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card
Earn 60,000 Points
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles!
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card
Earn 75,000 Miles
Chase Ink Business Unlimited® Credit Card
Earn $750 Cash Back
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
The Business Platinum Card® from American Express
Earn 120,000 Membership Reward® Points

Recent Posts

  • Polaris Lounge LAX Nightcap
    Polaris Lounge Nightcap At LAX May 31, 2023
  • Harvest Grain Bowl United Airlines
    Harvest Grain Bowl In United Airlines First Class May 31, 2023
  • International Flight Attendant Day
    International Flight Attendant Day – Thank You May 31, 2023
  • Cathay Pacific Flight Attendants Fired
    Cathay Pacific Flight Attendants Fired For Mocking Mainland Passenger May 31, 2023

Categories

Popular Posts

  • Punches United Airlines Gate Agent
    Man Repeatedly Punches United Airlines Gate Agent After She Asked Him To Vacate First Class Seat He Poached May 3, 2023
  • American Airlines Pins Cockpit Door
    American Airlines First Class Passenger So Angry Over Meal Choices He Pins Flight Attendant To Cockpit Door May 11, 2023
  • Cursing Fight United Airlines
    “Don’t You Ever Tell Me To Speak English!” (Fight Breaks Out On My United Airlines Flight) May 17, 2023
  • American Airlines Sewing Machine
    American Airlines Forced Woman To Check Her Sewing Machine, Then Butchered it May 2, 2023

Archives

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr    

As seen on:

live_and_lets_fly

The new United Polaris Lounge at Washington Dulles The new United Polaris Lounge at Washington Dulles is the most beautiful of all Polaris Lounges. Stay tuned for a detailed look and many more photos on the blog tomorrow. Well done @united.
@malaysiaairlines just announced it would retire i @malaysiaairlines just announced it would retire its A380 fleet. While not surprising, it is sad to see the growing list of carriers retiring this superjumbo jet. On Malaysia Airlines, I flew the #A380 once from Kuala Lumpur (KUL) to London (LHR) and had the entire first class cabin to myself (full review on the blog). It was a beautiful flight that I will always remember.
Welcome to @fly_bur @aveloair! I am so excited tha Welcome to @fly_bur @aveloair! I am so excited that a new carrier, Avelo, has launched, especially from an airport just 12 minutes from my home!
I greatly miss the @lufthansa #747-8 at @flylaxair I greatly miss the @lufthansa #747-8 at @flylaxairport. Hopefully this summer it will return.

.
.
.
.
#Lufthansa #FirstClass #747 #747-8 #StarAlliance #Miles #Points
I recently spent a weekend at the @ventanabigsur. I recently spent a weekend at the @ventanabigsur. This is not only a lovely, all-inclusive resort, but one of the best properties to use your @hyatt World of Hyatt points.
.
.
.
.
#Hyatt #BigSur #California #WorldofHyatt #CA-1 #Points #Hotels
In terms of a spacious first class product, the @E In terms of a spacious first class product, the @Emirates suite on a 777-300ER is hard to beat. My preference is Suite 2K.

.
.
.
.
#Emirates #777 #firstclass
Nearly five years ago, I took a “break” from I Nearly five years ago, I took a “break” from Instagram ahead of the birth of my first child. Goodness, how time flies. While I’ve enjoyed catching up on others over the years, now it is time for me to return to Instagram. In this first post, I highlight two joys in my life, my two children, whom I trust will grow up to be prolific travelers that circumnavigate the globe as ambassadors of love and respect.

.
.
.
.
.

#travel #airplanes #airlines #miles #points #familytravel #human #integrity #honor
United Airlines' new Polaris seat is a huge improv United Airlines' new Polaris seat is a huge improvement over UA's current business class seat. Check out my blog at liveandletsfly.com for 70+ photos of how @united is transforming its entire business class experience starting this December!
The perfect @flysas name tag for #Longyearben! The perfect @flysas name tag for #Longyearben!
Spotted four #polarbear outside of #longyearbyen - Spotted four #polarbear outside of #longyearbyen -- oh, and I love 40°F summer weather!
One of the best crews I have ever had the pleasure One of the best crews I have ever had the pleasure of flying with in all my years of flying. Thank you @flysas SK940 on 11 Aug 2016
Next stop ARN! But dear @flysas , next time if I a Next stop ARN! But dear @flysas , next time if I assign a window seat months in advance, don't move me to a center seat "for my convenience" with no way to get my original seat back... 😞
Ready for #PIA from #MAN to #JFK -- we will be rac Ready for #PIA from #MAN to #JFK -- we will be racing the #Delta flight to JFK at the gate next to us, which also departs at 12:45p. With @onemileatatime
Another room with a beautiful view... #hyattregenc Another room with a beautiful view... #hyattregencycasablanca #cassablanca #hyatt
Enjoying #shanghai with @onemileatatime from the i Enjoying #shanghai with @onemileatatime from the inside of the @grandhyatt_shanghai ... It is 40°C outside! 😓
From my front gate to my boarding gate in 15 minut From my front gate to my boarding gate in 15 minutes flat. I ❤️ #bur #burbankairport
Load More... Follow on Instagram
facebook twitter instagram rss

Privacy Policy

© Live and Let's Fly All Rights Reserved.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Live and Let's Fly with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.