President Trump’s new Qatari 747-8 has entered service as Air Force One, but a sudden switch back to the older presidential 747 after the NATO summit in Turkey has raised fresh questions about safety, transparency, and now press freedom.
Trump’s New Air Force One Raises Safety Questions, Then DOJ Targets Reporters Who Asked Them
President Donald Trump’s new Air Force One, the Boeing 747-8 gifted by Qatar and rapidly converted for presidential use, made its international debut this week on a trip to the NATO summit in Turkey.
But on the return journey, Trump did not fly the new aircraft out of Turkey.
Instead, he boarded one of the older VC-25A Boeing 747-200B aircraft that has long served as Air Force One (dating back to the first Bush administration). The official explanation from Trump was that he wanted to give American troops at RAF Mildenhall in the United Kingdom a chance to see the new red, white, and blue aircraft.
To honor our brave men and women of the Military, we are sending the brand new, and truly spectacular, Air Force One to Mildenhall Air Force Base, in the United Kingdom, to give them a chance to tour the Aircraft — Everybody is so excited, and we thought that they should be the first. For old time’s sake, we’ll be taking the former Air Force One, from Turkey to Mildenhall, a short trip that is totally worth doing in order to give our Great Military Heroes a chance to appreciate our beautiful new addition to the Air Force Fleet!
That explanation was not true.
Reporting from The New York Times, later echoed by other outlets, indicated that the real concern was security. The Qatari aircraft reportedly lacks some of the advanced missile detection and countermeasure systems found on the older Air Force One aircraft. Given heightened tensions with Iran and reported concerns about a possible threat to Trump, security officials apparently believed the older aircraft was the safer choice.
That is a very different story than “I wanted to show off the new plane to the troops.”
The Safety Question Is Legitimate
Air Force One is aa flying command center…and a high-value target. The older VC-25A aircraft may be aging, inefficient, and overdue for replacement, but they were built and modified over many years for the very specific job of transporting the president of the United States.
The Qatari 747-8 was converted quickly so Trump could use it before Boeing delivers the long-delayed purpose-built replacements. Some security and communications upgrades were reportedly omitted or not fully comparable to the legacy aircraft. That may be understandable given the rushed timeline, but it is precisely the sort of thing the public deserves to know.
This is especially true because taxpayers have paid substantial sums to transform the aircraft, and the arrangement surrounding the plane has been controversial from the start. The aircraft was accepted from Qatar, modified for use as Air Force One, and under the arrangement discussed when the gift emerged, could eventually be transferred to Trump’s presidential library foundation after he leaves office.
So yes, a foreign gift, presidential security, taxpayer-funded modifications, and a plane that Trump has treated as both a symbol of national power and a personal trophy is a matter of concern for U.S. taxpayers and voters.
Now DOJ Is Going After The Reporters
The most troubling part of this story is not the aircraft swap itself.
It is what happened next.
Now, the Trump administration has subpoenaed several New York Times reporters after their reporting on the Air Force One security concerns. The reporters reportedly include Julian Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt, and the subpoenas seek testimony before a federal grand jury.
That is a direct threat to press freedom.
The government has an interest in protecting classified information and national security. But subpoenas aimed at reporters after embarrassing but clearly newsworthy reporting should alarm everyone, regardless of politics. The purpose appears obvious: identify sources, intimidate journalists, and discourage future reporting on sensitive subjects that make the administration look bad.
That is retaliation, not accountability.
And it should bother the “drain the swamp” crowd most of all.
If you care about waste, secrecy, foreign influence, and government self-dealing, then this is exactly the kind of reporting you should want. A foreign-gifted aircraft, millions in taxpayer-funded modifications, safety concerns, and a plan that may ultimately place the aircraft in Trump’s orbit after he leaves office should be examined closely.
This is not “fake news”…it’s called oversight.
I do not agree with every editorial choice made by The New York Times, but this is the sort of reporting that explains why it remains the best newspaper in the world.
The Times uncovered a gap between what the president said publicly and what officials reportedly believed privately. It raised legitimate questions about whether the new Air Force One is suitable for all presidential travel, especially in higher-risk regions. It forced accountability around a project that has blended national security, foreign gifts, taxpayer expense, and personal branding in a way that should make every citizen uncomfortable.
That is what a free press is supposed to do!
It is not supposed to blindly accept the official explanation when the facts point elsewhere or look away because the subject involves aircraft security or a politically sensitive president.
The public does not need to know every classified detail of Air Force One’s defensive systems. But the public absolutely deserves to know whether the president’s new aircraft was considered less safe than the old one, whether taxpayers paid for a rushed conversion that still left major gaps, and whether the president misled the public about why he switched planes.
CONCLUSION
President Trump launched his new Qatari 747-8 as Air Force One, then switched back to the older 747-200B after the NATO summit in Turkey. Trump said he did so to show off the new aircraft to troops. Reporting indicates the real reason was safety, specifically concerns that the new aircraft lacked the advanced defensive systems of the older Air Force One.
That means Trump lied about the reason for the switch.
The proper response to that reporting is not to subpoena the journalists who uncovered it. Instead, it should answer the underlying questions. How much has this aircraft cost taxpayers to modify? What security capabilities were omitted or delayed? When is it safe for international presidential travel? And what exactly happens to this aircraft when Trump leaves office?
Those are fair questions.
The Trump administration’s apparent attempt to intimidate New York Times reporters is a serious threat to press freedom, and it should be condemned by anyone who claims to care about accountability in government.
This is not a partisan issue. It is exactly why investigative journalism matters and I bring it up here not just because this is an aviation-related blog, but because I am an American who cares deeply about press freedom. Vertias…
image: White House
You are full of sh*t.
How so?
No chance you get a legitimate response to this from him.
Because they are going after the LEAKERS, not the reporters and the DOJ said exactly that. But your TDS (yea I know you hate that term) wouldn’t allow you to report the entire story.
Unlike your recent story where you helped cover up a potential issue with a plane, these reporters put it out there.
The one with TDS is you. You have be deranged to not realize that trump is a fat diaper wearing dementia patient that only cares about himself
You don’t need a leak to know the new plane wasn’t safe. Come on, how dumb do you think we are? Of course there wasn’t time to add these systems when the two Boeing orders have faced years of delay over the very same issue. How stupid your idolatry is and how it clouds your judgment. End of discussion, grifter.
There were no “leakers”. Common sense combined with even a modicum of aviation knowledge would tell you that if it were possible to bring a Qatari sourced 748 to the standard of a VC-25A, let alone VC-25B standards, in a year, then we’d already have two VC-25Bs in service. Reporting on that necessarily involves calling on trusted sources and those trusted sources don’t “leak” anything by responding with an eye roll, a rhetorical “Why would you think that?”, or even a “No comment.” when both the facts and scenario are so abundantly obvious.
is there precedent for such a thing?
Your TDS is showing. Please get help soon. Thanks.
No, you & Trump are full of shit. This is perhaps his greatest gRift yet. He gives the Qataris God knows what, in exchange for a decked out 747-8. Then steals from every taxpayer to have it refurbished to his liking, and he will keep it after he leaves office.
On top of all that, he’s so egotistical that he can’t wait until it’s fortified for HIS safety. Like a little child who throws a tantrum to open his presents before Christmas morning after being told no.
Then he lies and uses the military as a scapegoat for his incompetent fk up, and sends the DOJ to attack journalists and the Constitution he swore to uphold.
You are full of shit, David. So is Chump.
That’s the David Miller I know from various blogs. A real piece of ass… whoopsie, I mean, work…
Right out of the Fascist playbook. Chapter one. Project 2025 seems tame compared to what is actually happening in this country.
All of this leads to November. What happens in the mid-terms will either ensure guard rails to a lunatic in the White House OR potentially turn into a deadly modern civil war. There is going to be a tipping point. November is likely it.
I mean, if he wants to take the risk, fine by me. Wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.
Ditto. A beatuiful example of poetic justice and/or karma. But, sadly, I doubt there would be any crew willing to accompany the idiot on a suicide mission…. ( unless maybe at gunpoint ! ) …
If one wants to have a small chance of understanding 10% of what is happening in the world, reading the front page of the NYT and WSJ every day, the leading center-left and center-right US newspapers, is mandatory.
These and other daily histrionics are concerning of course, but let’s not forget the President initiated a phone call with the same NYT reporter he keeps calling treasonous last month (on his 80th birthday no less!) to get press coverage of the ceasefire framework agreement. So folks can dismiss the NYT all they want, but the President sure has not.
Thank you, Peter. Well said. (For real, it’s like Trump has a fascination with NYT because it’s his ‘hometown’ paper.)
Typo in one of your first sentences. Let me fix it for you:
“….the Boeing 747-8 grifted from Qatar…”
Trump will destroy the messenger of anything not supportive of his lies. I dare his followers to try it.
Sounds like Kyle Prescott falls in line and would never disagree no matter how outrageous the Trump lie.
Nah, his nonsense about the war being over dozens of times and “they want to make a deal” over and over makes him look like a fool.
I just argue overall the country has never been in better shape for most and his work with illegals alone makes him a great President.
Read the story, they are going after the LEAKERS, as they should. Whomever leaked it violated the terms of their employment. Now I doubt these “reporters” will give anyone up trying to become famous martyrs to those on the left.
Personally if something happened to them on the way to testify, it “wouldn’t be the worst thing”. Of course that’s horrible to say but the sane thing was posted about the President of the United States above. And it seems to be commonplace here recently.
TDS lives!
Sir, ‘TDS’ and ‘price of eggs’ were yester-year’s one-liners… they’ve moved on to calling everyone ‘communists’ now…
Give it a rest Kyle. Continued repetition makes me question if you are high or suffering from a Matthew Klint Derangement Syndrome from facing certain truths. All the best in your recovery!
Only cult members instantly dismiss the slightest criticisms of their dear leader as some sort of mental illness.
And that goes for the left, too.
It seems that once again, telling the truth in Trumpton rather than subscribing to the lies the junta tells gets you into trouble.
For aviation enthusiasts → Both the new and old Air Force One are currently stationed at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S.
Thank you, good doctor; though, are you sure that wasn’t a “leak,” too? Uh oh… *service of process incoming*
Naturally, for national security reasons, we cannot be 100% certain of the current exact locations of these aircraft.
Thank you for your service! *salute*
You’re welcome and greetings!
More taxpayers money wasted after he was just showing off his red fiasco that now he’s afraid to fly.